Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Observation about the blog

My blog is titled 'Observations' of a talented idiot and not 'thoughts'. In this light, I must give my readers pure observations and not opinions or thoughts. Thus, I apologise for some of my recent posts, which I felt were not up to the mark, but I could not assign a reason to it. I hope this is an observation and I promise to make amends.

Friday, May 18, 2007

'Culture of Excellence' and the Individual

This post is closely related to the one before this.

I believe that any society that does not voluntarily reward quality where it seems to be unrewarded will eventually become obsolete and will rust to death. Nothing is free. If you don't pay for it now, you'll indirectly pay (perhaps more) for it later.


The statement might seem very obvious to begin with but it involves every individual including you.

Let me start by explaining the statement: Those who are in the habit of offering the best quality and continually improving upon it do it for its own sake. They enjoy it and that is why they do it. When they don't get paid for it, they do not necessarily stop and move on. They either get frustrated and do things ordinarily, which certainly leads to a drop in productivity, or they continue doing things their way even though the market does not pay them, which means that they become inefficient and are driven out by more efficient people who might not bother about quality enhancement. Thus, we get people who are not into quality and the society becomes stagnant. The times keep changing, and this stagnant society cannot keep up with the change. It eventually dies out and transforms itself.

Now let me give you some ideas of what this has to do with you:

1. You know that waiter at that restaurant who did a pretty good job and didn't get a good tip? He could have just stuck to the rules and served you like any other guy, but he tried to make it amazing for you. In a culture which does not tip every once in a while at least, these guys fade out or become inefficient. That waiter might continue doing his job that way, but the other waiters get less tired after doing their jobs and can perhaps earn some extra bucks doing side jobs while this guy does nothing. New waiters see this and are discouraged from offering quality even before the realise the joy in doing it. Nothing is free. If you don't pay for it now, you'll indirectly pay (perhaps more) for it later.

Lesson: Tip when you are impressed with some one's service.

2. Feel the air around you. Most probably, it was much fresher 20 years back. No body's been rewarding this quality in the environment for some time, and we've been feeling the results.

Lesson: Consciously do something for the environment. It is unpaid quality and needs to be rewarded.

3. Sportsmen: Young amateur level sportsmen often struggle very hard without reward to improve their game and very often have to give it up because of a lack of funding. Try and help them if you can. Remember, it's the pursuit of excellence that matters, not the field. The benefits of all quality seeking are highly transferable across fields.

Lesson: Try and help budding sportsmen, artists and scholars when possible.


*I know that what I am saying is well covered by that body of thought under 'positive externalities' in economics, but I am concerned with solving that problem on an individual level here, not theorise about it and suggest policy decisions.

I have also been thinking about the open source software movement in this context, but I cannot get a result yet.


Wednesday, May 16, 2007

A suggestion on the "Standard of Living" concept

I have already talked about the virtues of doing every little thing that you do extraordinarily well, from the viewpoint of being peaceful in life. (See my older post called "The Truth About Happiness")

What I would like to do now is talk about the idea of "Standard of Living" and what it has to do with the idea expressed above.

To begin with, by "Standard of Living", I mean the quality of the life that a person or a society lives. Which is simply to say that it means how happily a person or a society lives. Any other idea of the Standard of Living is rather useless to me because it does not tell me what I want to know.

Now, I strongly feel that the standard of living of a person or a society is seen in its most ordinary and unimportant actions. If those actions are done properly (or even better, extraordinarily well,) I would suggest that the standard of living of that person or society is very high.

This is because the very fact that unimportant and ordinary things are being done well suggests a commitment to quality. Only a commitment to quality and an active pursuit of it ensures real happiness in my opinion.

* This post relies on three important ideas;

1. Extraordinary teams and extraordinary persons do ordinary things extraordinarily well. - A line used by many people including Shiv Khera, Greg Chappell and Stephen Covey.
2. Swami Vivekananda, an Indian guru, once said that if you want to really see the merits of a yogi, do not see how he meditates, see how he makes his bed. ( This is closely related to '1' above)
3. The post is an extension of my ideas in "The Truth About Happiness.")



Sunday, May 13, 2007

How to Use This Blog: Short Comment

While I am happy about the increase in the number of comments on my blog, I must point something very important: when reading this blog, my intention is to give people 'clues' with my words.

Please understand this:

I do not want to tell anybody anything precise and exact. I only hope, always, that after reading what I write, there will be some sort of realisation in the mind of the reader, for which my writing is just a catalyst.

Please do not infer too much from my writing. Read it and the rest is left to that wonderful instrument that you have (and this idiot doesn't have much of!)

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

Classification v. Continuity

I know that this suggestion is very difficult to implement, but try it:

When thinking of things and analysing them, try not to classify them into categories. Put them on a scale.

For example: Norway is a cold country and Singapore is a warm country.

This classification seems perfectly justified, but it leads to a liking for oversimplification, where we continuously put things and people into categories just for the analytical pleasure of it. Try forming a description of any person you know and you'll get what I mean.

What should be done is to just keep things on a scale and analyse things comparatively.

For Example : Norway is colder than Singapore.

Such a method of analysis keeps the analysis more realistic.

Thursday, May 03, 2007

Is This The End?

Hello Everybody,

Regular visitors to this blog must have noticed that in the past few months, the already irregular flow of posts has trickled down to nothing. There have been instances in the past when this happenned but I am inclined to think that those instances were only seasonal variations in the flow of my observations....

An unfortunate series of events has, I am afraid, blocked the free flow of my observations in a manner which makes me think that the cause of this scarcity of good thought is more structural than seasonal this time.

I am noting this down on my blog because I think that the explicit definition of the problem might lead the way towards a possible solution. I believe the problem has a lot to do with a loss of both the environment conducive to my thinking as well as the methodology which refines the original observations.

In brief, I've lost material!! A writer's block perhaps.

All help will be entertained. Your suggestions will do a lot.

Please Help!

Yours Idiotically,
Talented Idiot.